Impact Linked Compensation (ILC): Aligning Financial Incentives with Sustainability Goals
Impact Linked Compensation (ILC) is gaining traction in the world of sustainable finance, tying compensation to the achievement of impact targets. ILC mechanisms promote a positive impact outcomes while ensuring that financial returns remain robust. Whether you’re an investor or looking for fundraising, understanding ILC is key for the future of capital raising.
What is Impact Linked Compensation (ILC)?
Impact Linked Compensation (ILC) is a financial incentive structure where compensation is tied to achieving specific impact goals. This mechanism ensures that fund managers and portfolio companies are financially rewarded for meeting or exceeding these targets, thereby incentivising actions that contribute to sustainable development.
ILC plays a pivotal role in aligning the interests of investors and fund managers with broader sustainability objectives. By linking compensation to impact, ILC encourages investments that generate positive social and environmental outcomes, thus fostering a culture of accountability and long-term thinking in the financial sector.
Mechanism of Impact Linked Compensation
Creating ILC targets involves a detailed process to ensure they are ambitious yet achievable. The Theory of Change (ToC) framework is instrumental in defining these impact targets.
Theory of Change (ToC) Framework
The Theory of Change (ToC) framework is a comprehensive methodology used to plan, execute, and evaluate the impact of initiatives. In the context of ILC, the ToC framework helps in mapping out the steps required to achieve the (sustainability) targets set, providing a clear pathway for short- and long-term impact measurement. This usually follows five steps:
- Identify and Allocate Resources: Determine the specific resources—financial, human, and technological—required to carry out your activities effectively. This includes assessing the availability and allocation of these resources to ensure they support the strategic goals of the initiative.
- Define and Implement Activities: Outline the specific activities that your organisation is currently undertaking. Detail the strategies, programs, and interventions designed to drive the necessary changes and achieve intermediate outcomes.
- Measure Direct Outputs: Identify the direct, immediate results of your activities. These outputs are the tangible products or services generated by your efforts, serving as measurable milestones towards achieving broader impact objectives.
- Evaluate Direct Impact: Assess the immediate changes and improvements resulting from your outputs. This involves analysing how these direct impacts contribute to achieving the desired social and environmental outcomes and addressing the intermediate outcomes identified earlier.
- Analyse Indirect Impact: Explore the long-term, indirect effects stemming from the direct impacts of your activities. This involves understanding how initial changes propagate over time, influencing broader systemic changes and contributing to the ultimate sustainability goals.
Using the ToC framework, fund managers can develop clear and structured impact targets that are both ambitious and achievable. The ToC helps in aligning the activities of portfolio companies with the broader sustainability goals of the fund, ensuring that each step taken contributes to the ultimate impact.
Establishing Internal KPIs at the Fund Level
At the fund level, establishing internal Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) is crucial to ensure progress on your impact targets. These KPIs can be set using either a top-down or bottom-up approach:
- Top-Down Approach: Targets are set at the fund level and then cascaded down to the portfolio companies. This approach ensures alignment with the fund’s overall strategy and impact goals.
- Bottom-Up Approach: Targets are set at the portfolio company level and then aggregated to meet the overall fund objectives. This approach leverages the specific strengths and contexts of individual companies, promoting greater ownership and commitment to achieving the targets.
Both approaches have their merits and can be tailored to specific fund structures and investment strategies.
Implementation of an ILC Scheme
Implementing an ILC scheme involves several critical steps:
- Defining Metrics and Targets: Metrics should be specific, measurable, and aligned with the fund’s impact goals. Targets must be ambitious yet realistic to drive meaningful progress.
- Establishing Governance Mechanisms: Effective governance is essential for the success of an ILC scheme. This includes defining the roles of fund managers, limited partners (LPs), and impact committees.
- Traditional Structure: In a traditional fund structure, portfolio companies receive the investment, and the general partner (GP) manages the fund. The LPs are the owners of the capital but do not typically manage the fund.
- Role of LPs and Impact Committee: While LPs should not directly define impact KPIs, the Impact Committee validates these KPIs and targets. They can amend or seek clarity on KPIs during their meetings and make adjustments as necessary.
- Impact Committee: The Impact Committee ensures that the targets are ambitious and aligned with the fund’s sustainability goals. They play a crucial role in maintaining accountability and providing oversight.
- Linkage to Sustainability Linked Loans (SLLs): Principles of SLLs can be applied to ILC schemes. Setting ambitious targets and ensuring accountability through transparent reporting are key elements that drive success.
Want to know more about Sustainability Linked Loans? Check out our blog!
Criticisms and Responses
Despite its advantages, ILC mechanisms face criticisms and challenges. One common criticism is the potential for “short-termism”, where targets focus on immediate impacts rather than long-term sustainability. Critics argue that this could lead to a “myopic” view, undermining broader sustainability goals.
However, ILC schemes are designed to address these concerns. By incorporating both positive impact targets and measures to reduce negative impacts, ILC provides a balanced approach. Investment managers can use this mechanism to manage their impact goals in a concrete and practical manner.
It is also important to scale down the “carrot and stick” incentive mechanism to portfolio companies. Since both the fund and the companies benefit from meeting the targets, portfolio companies need to have an incentive to achieve the set targets. That way, the burden of data collection and performance measurement does not solely rest on the company without corresponding benefits. Creative solutions for compensating companies for their sustainability performance are essential for the effective implementation of ILC schemes.
Conclusion
Impact Linked Compensation (ILC) is a transformative approach that aligns financial incentives with sustainability goals. By tying compensation to the achievement of impact targets, ILC promotes positive social and environmental outcomes while ensuring robust financial returns.
While there are criticisms and challenges, ILC offers a practical tool for managing impact goals and driving sustainable finance. Its ability to incentivise both fund managers and portfolio companies makes it a compelling strategy for advancing sustainability objectives.
Any questions?
At Sustainable Capital Group, we understand the complexities of EU regulations in sustainable finance, and our sector experts are here to assist you. For personalised guidance, simply fill out our contact form, and we’ll be in touch with you shortly.
